Google+ Followers

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Global Warming Hoax Faces Unfathomable Cold in NH? Mount Washington, called Agiocochook by some Native American tribes, is the highest peak in the Northeastern United States at 6,288 ft and the most prominent mountain east of the Mississippi River. The mountain is notorious for its erratic weatherin New Hampshire Reached An Insane 85 Below This Week.

After liberal dullards Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore released dual climate change movies this year, the northeastern U.S. is seeing massively cold temperatures.

 

It was 35 degrees below zero at 6:40 a.m. with blowing snow, sustained winds of 75 miles per hour and freezing fog, according to the weather observatory atop the mountain.
The wind chill registered at 80 degrees below zero.

The only colder place in the world was Watson Lake, which is located in Canada's Yukon Territory. Temperatures there were 40 degrees below zero, though conditions were calm.
Researchers braved the cold to toss boiling water into the wind, where it froze immediately! See more in the video above.
http://www.wmur.com/article/cold-snap-makes-mount-washington-second-coldest-place-on-earth/8507710
global warming
Mount Washington, called Agiocochook by some Native American tribes at 6,288 ft , is the highest peak in the Northeastern United States at 6,288 ft and the most prominent mountain east of the Mississippi River. The mountain is notorious for its erratic weather

 

While many on the left are continuing to perpetrate the great global warming hoax, science and common sense have collided in the late months of 2016 to provide an alternative to the globalist-democrat narrative.  Now, with temperature in New Hampshire hitting ridiculous lows, the entire nation is beginning to understand the depth of the liberal stranglehold on the story.
“Some schools closed early Thursday and many others delayed opening Friday to avoid a bone-chilling wait at the bus stop.We’re not strangers to these sorts of bitter temperatures on Mount Washington’s summit,’ senior weather observer Mike Carmon said in the weather observatory’s blog at the highest peak in the Northeast. ‘However, over the last few winters, it’s generally late January or February before we experience this sort of polar air outbreak.’
“The wind chill was down to 85-below at the summit early Friday.
“Utility workers were prepared for power outages due to fallen trees. David Flener, field safety manager at Eversource, New Hampshire’s largest utility, said workers are well-educated on how to stay warm in the coldest weather, starting before they even arrive on a job site. They are urged to make sure they carry an emergency kit with clothing and food in case they get stranded, and once they arrive, there is a discussion about on-the-job safety.”
You read that correctly; 85 below zero.  That is a temperature that you may expect in certain locales of Siberia, and far above the arctic circle.  It is certainly not the weather you could expect in the United States during a time of “global warming”.

 

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Death, Suffering, And Instability In Aleppo: Obama's Disastrous Syria Policy? Obama Say That, He Trying To Save The Planet? Look That All Smoke, So Much For Trying To Save The Planet. So Climate Change ( Is Not ) Greatest Threat To Humanity, After All.







The fall of Aleppo demonstrates the grave costs of American inaction. At nearly every turn of the conflict in Syria, the Obama administration yielded the military and strategic initiative to America’s enemies. The results are now plain to see. The death toll in Syria approaches a half-million men, women, and children. Millions more have been displaced, and the largest wave of refugees to reach Europe since World War II has created a crisis on the Continent.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/12/15/death-suffering-and-instability-aleppo-obamas-disastrous-syria-policy

More Berkeley B.S Experimental Claim: Treeline may not shift upward in elevation with warming

Image result for arborist meme



Let see again, they did not ask the right person, before putting this out, may -be they should have talk to an "Arborists" First, the one , who spend there life, talking care of tree's without there in put this is all shit.
http://www.environmentalscience.org/career/arborist


What the experiment really shows is that warming seedlings with infrared heaters was a fail.


The media release is below.
###
Study: Warming could slow upslope migration of trees
Berkeley Lab-led research shows some subalpine trees may have trouble gaining a foothold above the tree line
DOE/LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY
Scientists expect trees will advance upslope as global temperatures increase, shifting the tree line–the mountain zone where trees become smaller and eventually stop growing–to higher elevations. Subalpine forests will follow their climate up the mountain, in other words.
But new research published Dec. 15 in the journal Global Change Biology suggests this may not hold true for two subalpine tree species of western North America. According to the study, Engelmann spruce may not move to higher elevations as temperatures rise, and its lower-elevation boundary could recede upslope, so its overall range could shrink. And the hardy limber pine may advance upward in a warmer climate, but likely at the same slow pace as in today’s climate.
The research was conducted by scientists from the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), UC Merced, the U.S. Geological Survey, UC Berkeley, and the University of Colorado at Boulder.
Their surprising findings are based on the discovery that the two species can be harmed by warming during the earliest stages of their lives, even at the cold, high-elevation edge of forest growth. In addition, seeds from trees now growing at the upper boundary of the species’ range may not fare well at higher elevations. These insights could help scientists improve models that predict where and how fast subalpine forests will move in a warming climate.
“The assumption that trees will track their climate underestimates the challenges they face during seedling recruitment. The odds are stacked against trees at this stage, even under normal conditions, and we found that warming decreases the young trees’ odds of survival even more,” says research leader Lara Kueppers, a scientist in Berkeley Lab’s Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division and at UC Merced’s Sierra Nevada Research Institute.
“This means there’s a real risk that climate change may outpace tree migration–some trees may not be able to keep up with their climate,” Kueppers adds. “Seedlings are the future of the forest, so it’s very important to learn how warming will affect them.”
Scientists are interested in predicting what will happen to subalpine forests as the climate warms because a shift in the boundary between forest and alpine tundra biomes holds big implications for mountain water resources, the carbon cycle, and the planet’s climate.
“Tree seedlings growing in the alpine tree line are an indicator of the early impacts of climate change on mountain habitats,” says Matt Germino, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist who contributed to the research. “The response of tree seedlings to carefully controlled warming treatments offers a window into a warmer world for forests.”
To shed light on the future of subalpine forests, the scientists set up experiments at Niwot Ridge, an ecological research site in Colorado’s Rocky Mountains. They focused on the impacts of warming on the first four years of the trees’ lives. They also accounted for the role of localized genetic adaptation by studying seeds collected from low and high elevation areas within the trees’ ranges. Both of these factors, seedling recruitment and genetic adaptation, are not well represented in models that predict the species’ responses to warming.
The scientists planted the seeds at three sites, one at the low-elevation edge of subalpine forest, another at the high-elevation edge of the forest (the current tree line), and a third site in the alpine zone where the trees don’t grow.
At each site, they planted 20 gardens divided into four groups. One group was heated from March to November with infrared heaters. This melted the snow early and raised the soil and seedling temperatures by several degrees, mimicking the effects of climate change. A second group was heated and watered, a third group was only watered, and a fourth control group was left untouched. The researchers planted the gardens each fall from 2009 to 2013 and followed their progress through 2014.
Counter to expectations, they found that warming reduced seedling survival for both species at all three elevations during the first year of life. The scientists expected survival rates to dip at the lower elevation site, where temperatures rose above the trees’ normal climate, but not higher up, where warming was expected to help seedlings. They attribute this lower survival rate to drier conditions caused by warming, which negatively affected seedling survival.
Survival rates diverged for the two species after the first year. For the limber pine, the scientists found some benefits of warming at some sites, but not enough to reverse the negative effects from the first year. So, after four years, there wasn’t a measurable effect of warming on survival.
“From this, we infer that limber pine has the potential to persist at its current location and expand upslope into the alpine zone, but it won’t expand any faster in a warmer climate,” says Kueppers.
For the Engelmann spruce, the negative impact of warming persisted through the fourth year. In addition, no warmed seedlings survived to be 4 years old at the low-elevation site. This means warming could impede the upward expansion of the species and cause the lower-elevation edge of its range to contract upslope.
In another surprise, the scientists found that seeds collected from lower elevation areas survived better in the alpine zone than seeds collected from higher elevations. This too could slow the upslope expansion of subalpine trees, as it’s hard for lower elevation seeds to “leapfrog” over higher elevation trees and establish themselves above the current tree line.
“Overall, our findings indicate that seedlings are highly vulnerable to climate variation, which should be taken into account as we predict what will happen to subalpine forests in a warming climate,” says Kueppers.
###
The research was supported in part by the Department of Energy’s Office of Science.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory addresses the world’s most urgent scientific challenges by advancing sustainable energy, protecting human health, creating new materials, and revealing the origin and fate of the universe. Founded in 1931, Berkeley Lab’s scientific expertise has been recognized with 13 Nobel Prizes. The University of California manages Berkeley Lab for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science. For more, visit http://www.lbl.gov.


DOE’s Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States, and is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, please visit science.energy.gov.

Monday, December 12, 2016

How to Win Climate Change Debate Every Time (Global Warming Hoax)

Dr Roy Spencer - 97% Concensus is Bogus

World-wide, Global Trash Fires Are The Inheritance Of All Liberals? And They Tell Us There Trying to Save The Planet? Fuuny Way Of Doing It?

 Image result for save the planet quotes




I think Democrat, Liberal, Progressive fanatics are funny.They are funny to watch melting down over Trump’s win.They are hilarious to watch as they flail and scrabble to invent the next Fake News lie to try and harm or take down their arch-enemy. It’s like in some 1941 serial cliffhanger—the heroic Captain Trump, “strange” visitor from another planet, vs The Evil Dark Scorpion.

Yes, Trump is from Earth. While the prog fanatic followers of The Scorpion are from Planet Nemesis, orbiting and lost on the border of deep space.

Nemesis is a dark world. It’s cold, and swept by black storms of ash and smoke.
But the ash is not from volcanoes. It’s trash fires.

World-wide, global trash fires are the Inheritance of all liberals. Burning, smoky, ash-blown, suffocating bon fires of trash, garbage, and human waste.
Some would say, “wasted humans.”

Because there is nothing to so-called Liberalism. It is a false construct of unreasonable dreams, phony lies, and impossible utopian “paradises,” all slopped together in a fetid tub of leaking human waste.
Wasted humans.

They are dangerous to life, liberty, and private property. They are dangerous to truth, justice, and the American way.What to do with them?Okay, we can’t “kill the liberals.”

Besides; they were just born that way.
They can’t help themselves. They didn’t ask to be liberals. No, we can’t hurt or harm them, because they are part of Humanity.

And yet, they are so dangerous as to threaten the existence of life on Earth. They are so dangerous in their flailing lashes with words and weapons, that they threaten to convert Earth to another Nemesis. They are so blinded by the blowing ash and smoke of their own occult world, that they would destroy ours.
They would destroy the hopes and dreams of sane human beings rooted in the green grass and blue seas of Planet Earth. And they would destroy America The Beautiful.

Okay, we can’t “kill the liberals.” And we can’t eat them. Both acts are illegal.
So, then…what to do about their constant, raging, brutal violence and threats? How do we counter the vicious, never-ending Fake News attacks of their world-wide propaganda machine? How do we block their destructive, mindless Jihad to obliterate America and Americans and substitute their own desiccated stench-filled world of Nemesis?

We can’t harm them. We can’t send them away in boxcars, or to camps. We can’t shoot them or imprison them. Even though theses are the things they say they want to do to us.

So…what do we do to defend ourselves—our families, our heritage, our humanity, our blue and green world—our beautiful Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?

We laugh at them.Ridicule them.Mock them.
Challenge them, call them liars, call them names of shame and blame.

But don’t—EVER—for one thin moment or instance, EVER believe them.
Take them seriously, as you would any lethal threat. Yes.

But laugh in their faces. And ignore them thereafter—ANYthing they say, print, or screen. Minimize and kick to the curb, their feverish, panicky lies, their perverted Fake News,  and their false, self-destructive, phony world of an ash-filled, burning Nemesis.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/world-wide-global-trash-fires-are-the-inheritance-of-all-liberals?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=e58b7dd74b-CFP+Daily+Mailout&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-e58b7dd74b-297703129&mc_cid=e58b7dd74b&mc_eid=5f77ccf796#


Monday, December 5, 2016

Measuring Sea Level Is a Suspect Art?

 Image result for al gore a liar




A catastrophic rise in sea level is one of the calamities anticipated by those who believe in climate change.  The believers and the skeptics can carry on a scientific discussion about this matter only if they actually know what the current sea level is and how it has been behaving.  Both sides tend to accept that data published by NASA and NOAA regarding measured year-to-year changes in sea level fit the bill.  But are those numbers accurate and scientifically credible?  Conceptual problems associated with identifying sea level combined with the technological limitations on how we go about taking measurements make that unlikely.

NOAA and NASA claim that sea level is currently rising about an eighth of an inch per year.  This is more or less equivalent to the stack height of just two quarters.  However, neither of the two measurement systems upon which estimates of sea level rely can measure so precisely.  The two measurement systems are tide gauges in coastal areas and satellite pings over the oceans.  Neither can record measurements of sea level to a level of precision any better than a few inches.

This problem of instrumental crudity is overcome by assuming that measurement imprecision is unbiased in its distribution and that a large number of measurements taken in a very short span of time can be averaged together to yield an estimate of sea level that is both more precise and more accurate than the actual data obtained from the individual instruments.

With this as introduction, consider some of the problems associated with measuring sea level.  First, the sea does not lie flat.  It never lies flat.  Waves or swells constantly vary the height of the sea surface, and that variation typically exceeds a foot or two at least a handful of times every minute.  Even when the sea appears to be calm, the subtle undulations of passing swells work the same magic.  But usually the sea is not calm, and actual sea level height at any particular point is unpredictable.

Tides are marginally more predictable, but they change the level of the sea perhaps twice as much on average as do waves and swells.  They do so at a slower pace – alternating between peaks and valleys only once or twice a day – but when trying to ascertain the global average sea level for a year, this is still an enormous amount of noise to filter out of the computation. 

The practice of averaging multiple measurements to improve instrumental precision may be appropriate, but it is not appropriate when scientists use the same approach for canceling out the effects of waves and swells and tides.  A computed average (mean) deserves credibility only if the data values are distributed normally (so as to describe the well known bell-shaped curve).  But waves and swells and tides clearly do not vary sea level according to this limitation.  Instead, they linger at the extremes (e.g., high and low tides) and quickly pass by the middle range, where the computed average is bound to fall.  

A second problem for measuring sea level is that there is no way to determine whether it is the same for different locations.  One theoretically logical way of doing so would be to express it as a specified distance from the exact center of the Earth.  But the earth is not a perfect sphere – its diameter at the equator is thirteen miles greater than its diameter measured from pole to pole – and even as an oblate spheroid the earth is less than perfect since the northern and southern hemispheres are not mirror images.

This line of abstract thought may seem unproductive, but to pursue it brings one to the realization that absolute sea level at one location is hard to compare to that of another location.  And yet, if we are to know the global average sea level, do we not need to have some credible method for making such comparisons?

A third measurement problem is that the Earth's land masses are not stationary.  Geologists believe that the Earth's crust floats on a superheated liquefied rock known as the mantle.  The viscosity of the mantle is much greater than that of water but nonetheless retains enough fluidity that the relatively rigid crust floats on it.  This means that a local alteration in the weight of the crust will cause it to float higher or settle deeper in the underlying mantle.  To complicate things, the relative rigidity of the crust means that a shift up or down in one locale inevitably triggers an opposing vertical movement in peripheral areas.

When the northern half of North America lost all its ice at the end of the last glacial period around 12,000 years ago, the weight of the underlying crust was greatly diminished.  The affected region buoyed upward many hundreds of feet over the course of the ensuing millennia.  The adjustment continues even today, although at a much slower rate than it did early on.  This is an example (albeit a dramatic one) of a process that is still ongoing in much of Europe and North America.  Consider what it means for measuring sea level. 

But ice and its disappearance are not the only way that the thickness of the crust gets altered.  In many regions – both on land and under the sea – the crust is being thickened by the forces that make mountains, and everywhere on land weathering and erosion continually operate to grade the continent back down to sea level.  In the process, the removed overburden gets transported some distance and ends up back in the ocean.  In short, the forces of geomorphology are constantly altering the thickness of the Earth's crust most everywhere. 

These additions to and subtractions from the thickness of the crust tend to concentrate in coastal areas, where the question of sea level has its relevance.  Also, the forces of uplift and mountain building can and do occur in the relatively thin crust beneath the sea, so a reconfiguration of the ocean bottom may cause a rise in sea level not due to an increased water volume.

Vertical movements of the crust do occur, and there is no system in place that can measure their direction or magnitude.  In short, even if we can very precisely measure the changing relationship between a coastline and the ocean, we usually cannot evaluate how much of that change is due to a rise or fall of the ocean and how much is due to vertical movement of the crust.

These complications (and many others) challenge the credibility of any numbers claiming to tabulate the exact amount of annual sea level change.  Those official numbers may be correct, but don't bet the farm on it.  And even if they are correct, there is no assurance that they indicate a changing amount of water in the ocean. 

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Wildfires in Sevier County, Tennessee.,Gatlinburg Fire's: Death toll rises to 7 And Al Gore Army Will Blame on You Guess It ,Global Warming

 Related image
The three additional bodies that have been recovered after fires in Sevier County, Tennessee, were found at the same residence, authorities said. 
[Breaking news update, posted at 4:21 p.m. ET]
Officials have recovered the bodies of three more people killed in the wildfires in Sevier County, Tennessee. A total of seven people have died, authorities said Wednesday. Sevier County Mayor Larry Waters says more than 400 structures have been destroyed by fires in the country. Three people were rescued. He thanked "the big guy up above" for the rain Wednesday, which has helped firefighters.
[Previous version, posted at 2:30 p.m.]
James Wood's mother was telling him on the phone that the wildfire that had roared into Gatlinburg had ignited her home.
Then he lost the connection. He hasn't heard from his mom, Alice Hagler, since that Monday night.
Hagler is one of several people said to be missing after wildfires scorched roughly 15,000 acres in a resort-heavy area of eastern Tennessee, showered residents with embers and forced tourists to evacuate from their accommodations. 
The fires, which spread with little warning Monday from the Great Smoky Mountains into inhabited areas in and near the resort towns of Gatlinburg and Pigeon Forge, have left at least four people dead and 45 others injured, officials said. More than 250 buildings in the county are said to be damaged or destroyed.
"We had been talking for several hours on and off," Wood told CNN affiliate WATE on Tuesday night. He had been living with his mother at her Gatlinburg house for the last five months but wasn't home that night. 
"She called me at 8:30 (p.m.) and said the house was on fire. I told her to get out immediately. We got disconnected and I have not been able to get in touch with her since," said Wood.
Fire evacuee: It was a firestorm

Fire evacuee: It was a firestorm 01:44
Hagler's relatives say they hope she might be taking shelter with someone and just hasn't been able to make contact. It's a hope echoed by several other families who say their loved ones in the Gatlinburg area are missing.
"Our search and rescue teams are going out house by house," Sevier County Mayor Larry Waters told CNN on Wednesday. "There's a few areas that we were unable to get to on Monday night because of the swift nature of the firestorm ... and we're finishing those up today.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/30/us/gatlinburg-fires/index.html
Image result for al gore a liar
Image result for al gore a liar

Hey Al Gore, What Happen Here? Here Other An Inconvenient Truth For You Al Gore NOAA: U.S. Completes Record 11 Straight Seasons Without Major Hurricane Strike

 Image result for al gore  here other an inconvenient truth





Today the United Sates completes a record 11 straight hurricane season without a major hurricane striking the U.S. mainland, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
An unprecedented 11 years, one month and six days has passed since the last major hurricane struck the U.S. mainland, according to data going back to 1851compiled by NOAA.
“The 2016 hurricane season will end officially on November 30. Hurricane Wilma was the last major hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) to strike the U.S. (October 24, 2005),” NOAA spokesman Dennis Feltgen told CNSNews.com.
Major hurricanes, defined on the scale as a Category 3 or above, are characterized by wind speeds of 111 mph or higher and strong storm surges capable of causing “devastating” or “catastrophic” damage.
“It is important to note that this scale covers only the wind impact,” Feltgen noted. “It has nothing to do with the water impact, which accounts for nearly 90 percent of the fatalities - 50 percent of which occur from storm surge and 25 percent from inland flooding.

“The U.S. has seen major impacts from many hurricanes with significantly lower winds on the scale. Sandy in 2012 andMatthew in 2016 are just two examples,” he pointed out.
The U.S. has now experienced more than 11 years of below-normal levels of hurricane activity since 2005, when four major hurricanes – Dennis, Katrina, Rita, and Wilma – struck the continental U.S., killing nearly 4,000 people and causing nearly $160 billion in damages.
Last month, Hurricane Matthew - the first Category 5 hurricane to form in the Atlantic since 2007 – was downgraded to a Category 1 by the time it madelandfall in the U.S. on October 8th, two weeks short of the 11-year anniversary ofHurricane Wilma’s landfall.
About 97 percent of all Atlantic basin hurricanes form during hurricane season, which lasts from June 1st to November 30th. Peak hurricane activity typically occurs between mid-August and late October.

Of the total 991 hurricanes recorded between 1851 and 2015, only 12 have been off-season hurricanes that formed between December and May, according to NOAA. Of those, none made landfall in the continental U.S.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/noaa-uncertainty-about-whether-high-activity-level-atlantic

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

'Al Gore's Wrong'!!! Again!

Image result for al gore a liar

'Al Gore's Wrong'!!! Again! , His Latest Global Warming Narrative Fail

Image result for al gore a liar
Image result for al gore a liar
http://science.politifake.org/image/political/1502/gore-making-those-with-good-arguments-and-evidence-for-globa-politics-1423967791.jpg
Image result for al gore a liar

'Al Gore's Wrong'!!! Again! , His Latest Global Warming Narrative Fail

 Related image




a study headed by Dr. Jonathan Day, published in the journal The Cryosphere, global warming has just suffered another narrative fail.

Contrary to global warming, or climate change (or whatever they are calling it these days to fit the narrative) enthusiasts' claim, Dr. Day and his fellow researchers have found that there has been no significant change to the Antarctic sea ice.

It was thought that the South Pole ice has declined significantly since the 1950s, a trend scientists have insisted is linked to the increased use in fossil fuels by man. But after in-depth research of the work from explorers Robert Falcon Scott and Ernest Shackleton, among others, it appears that ​conditions are "virtually identical" to the findings from an early 1900s exploration on the continent. This suggests that declines may be part of a natural cycle, not a product of man-made global warming.

"Scientists have only really looked at Antarctic sea ice levels from the 1950s onward, which shows a relative decline in sea ice. But Day’s study shows current Antarctic sea ice 'is just 14 per cent smaller than at the highest point of the 1900s and 12 per cent bigger than than than the lowest point,'" notes The Daily Caller. 


We know that sea ice in the Antarctic has increased slightly over the past 30 years, since satellite observations began. Scientists have been grappling to understand this trend in the context of global warming, but these new findings suggest it may not be anything new," writes Dr. Day. 
"If ice levels were as low a century ago as estimated in this research, then a similar increase may have occurred between then and the middle of the century, when previous studies suggest ice levels were far higher," he adds.

Further, research by the British Antarctic Survey indicates that "present day loss of the Pine Island Glacier on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has been happening since the mid 20th century and was probably caused by El Nino activity rather than global warming," reports The Telegraph. 
“We are very excited about this new finding as it provides the first direct evidence of the timing of glacier retreat even before we had satellites to measure them,” said marine geologist Dr. James Smith, the lead author of the study.

They show us how changes half-way across the planet in the tropical Pacific, reached through the ocean to influence the Antarctic ice sheet," said Dr. Smith.

“A significant implication of our findings is that once an ice sheet retreat is set in motion it can continue for decades, even if what started gets no worse," explained Professor Bob Bindschadler of NASA. “It is possible that the changes we see today on Pine Island Glacier were essentially set in motion in the 1940s.”

Although those on the right who openly question the extend of "man-made" global warming are castigated as so-called "deniers"--as if global warming were a religion--there have been a number of renowned scientists who have found data contradicting such a narrative. These latest findings are just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

In December of 2015, The Daily Wire published a comprehensive rebuke of the man-made global warming narrative, all backed by scientific facts and findings of course. To read science professor Mike van Biezen's assault on the narrative the left will continue to push without so much as thought to dissidents or the economy, click here.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/11138/latest-global-warming-narrative-fail-amanda-prestigiacomo&utm_medium=email&utm_content=112916-news&utm_campaign=position5

Thursday, November 10, 2016

In 2016, The Term AGW, Now Stands Officially Defined As 'Al Gore's Wrong'!!!



The Worthlessness of the Paris Climate Agreement , It Just As Use-Less As The 1997 Kyoto Climate Agreement


Kyoto Protocol: 10 years of the world’s first climate change treaty

 It was hailed as an “environmentally strong and economically sound” deal by US president Bill Clinton, speaking just after agreement had been reached in 1997.
http://www.climatechangenews.com/2015/02/16/kyoto-protocol-10-years-of-the-worlds-first-climate-
/Image result for Al gore worth-less





Barack Obama and other climate zealots have been patting themselves on the back for a year about the “historic” Paris Agreement signed last Winter. Celebrated as a powerful, multinational stand against global warming, the endless rounds of self-congratulation has left little room for actual explanation. We are apparently just expected to assume that it’s a “good thing” and ask no further questions.

For academics like Professor David Campbell of Lancaster University Law School, though, that wasn’t quite satisfying enough. In a new paper, Campbell asks the question that Obama and other world leaders would prefer to ignore – namely: “What does the Paris Agreement actually do?”
And in Campbell’s estimation, the answer is: Not a whole hell of a lot.

“Though very widely believed to be inadequate in the target it sets, the Paris Agreement is commonly thought actually to set a binding target of reducing global CO2e emissions so as to limit global warming to 2℃,” writes Campbell. “Proper legal interpretation of the Agreement shows it to set no such target. It rather gives the newly industrializing countries such as China and India a permission to emit as much as they see fit. These countries have been principally responsible for the huge growth in emissions since 1990 and they will be responsible for their continued huge growth until 2030.”
As such, Campbell concludes, the (don’t call it a) treaty isn’t just worthless; it’s actually at odds with the stated goals of climate change activists.

“The Paris Agreement therefore makes the policy of mitigation of global warming impossible,” he writes. “However, this policy has been impossible over the whole of the now more than a quarter century of international climate change policy.”

Indeed, the countries most responsible for carbon emissions are not only free to keep industrializing as they see fit, most of them are actively building as many coal plants as they can afford. India, China, Turkey, Russia, Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands, and dozens of developing countries intend to build thousands of coal-fired power plants over the next 15 years.
In the wealthy Western world, only the U.S. and Canada have stopped expanding coal production in recent years.

Thus, we can see the Paris Agreement for what it really is: A farce intended to weaken America’s place in the global economy and redistribute wealth on an unprecedented scale. For perhaps the first time in history, we are watching the fall of an empire – not due to mistakes or outside forces, but due to the deliberate, intentional decisions of its own elected leaders.
http://www.conservativefreepress.com/politics/worthlessness-paris-climate-agreement/

Social Justice Warriors Trump Protestors Light Fires in Chicago Light Fires in Chicago And Add To Global Warming? Now, Proving Again, That Social Justice Warriors Are Idiots,

Image result for al gore global warming


Via WGN - Chicago police say they arrested five people as protesters expressed their disapproval of the election of Donald Trump as the nation's 45th president.

Thursday, November 3, 2016

NASA Scientists Invalidate the Global Warming Hypothesis

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Global Warming

The Global Warming Hoax Explained for Dummies

Top 10 FAILED Global Warming Predictions.mp4

Al Gore Predicts No Arctic Ice In 2013 and Fails, So Now Al Gore Again Is Predicting When The Arctic Will Be Ice-Free




he data reveal that for every metric ton of carbon dioxide that’s emitted, 3 meters squared of sea ice is lost.
The study predicts around 2040 or so for an ice-free Arctic.
The abstract and media release is below.
###
screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-1-58-12-pm
###
Predicting When the Arctic Will Have an Ice-Free Summer
For every metric ton of carbon dioxide that’s emitted into the atmosphere, there is a direct correlation in the amount of Arctic sea ice that is lost, a new study shows. Scientists have had difficulty predicting when the Arctic will be completely free of ice during the summer months, but this new analysis could help provide much more accurate predictions of such an occurrence. Dirk Notz and Julienne Stroeve analyzed Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature data over time, deriving a linear relationship between the average monthly abundance of sea ice in the Arctic in September and cumulative carbon dioxide emissions, for a roughly 30-year period. The data reveal that for every metric ton of carbon dioxide that’s emitted, 3 meters squared of sea ice is lost. The authors used this robust relationship in a collection of climate models that are part of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5), to project Arctic summer sea ice loss. These models often underestimate the extent of ice loss, they found; Notz and Stroeve suggest that CMIP5 models, based on existing knowledge of processes that shape ice loss, may not be accurately capturing the amount of incoming longwave radiation from the Sun, and the climate’s related response. The results of this study suggest that any measure to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions will directly slow the ongoing loss of Arctic summer sea ice. Therefore, the authors note that achieving a global warming target of 1.5°Celsius, which would involve reducing carbon dioxide emissions, would help extend the lifespan of diminishing summer ice.

Share this:

Schwarzenegger: Pollution Kills More People Then War? 160 Million People May Have Died In Wars During the 20th century, Schwarzenegger Cliam Debunked!

 160 million people died in wars during the 20th century see list below: 
Image result for Schwarzenegger idiot

























When it comes to the the environment, Arnold Schwarzenegger is a moron.
Click the image for the video.
http://junkscience.com/2016/11/schwarzenegger-pollution-kills-more-people-than-war/









1860-65: USA civil war (628,000)
1886-1908: Belgium-Congo Free State (8 million)
1898: USA-Spain & Philippines (220,000)
1899-02: British-Boer war (100,000)
1899-03: Colombian civil war (120,000)
1899-02: Philippines vs USA (20,000)
1900-01: Boxer rebels against Russia, Britain, France, Japan, USA against rebels (35,000)
1901-32: Saudis vs Arabian kingdoms (?)
1903: Ottomans vs Macedonian rebels (20,000)
1904: Germany vs Namibia (65,000)
1904-05: Japan vs Russia (150,000)
1910-20: Mexican revolution (250,000)
1911: Chinese Revolution (2.4 million)
1911-12: Italian-Ottoman war (20,000)
1912-13: Balkan wars (150,000)
1915-23: Ottoman genocides (1.2 million Armenians, 500,000 Assyrians, 350,000 Greek Pontians and 480,000 Anatolian Greeks)
1914-18: World War I (20 million)
1916: Kyrgyz revolt against Russia (120,000)
1917-21: Soviet revolution (5 million)
1917-19: Greece vs Turkey (45,000)
1918-20: Russian civil war (1 million)
1919-21: Poland vs Soviet Union (27,000)
1928-37: Chinese civil war (2 million)
1931: Japanese Manchurian War (1.1 million)
1932-33: Soviet Union vs Ukraine (10 million)
1932: "La Matanza" in El Salvador (30,000)
1932-35: "Guerra del Chaco" between Bolivia and Paraguay (117.500)
1934: Mao's Long March (170,000)
1936: Italy's invasion of Ethiopia (200,000)
1936-37: Stalin's purges (13 million)
1936-39: Spanish civil war (600,000)
1937-45: Japanese invasion of China (500,000)
1939-45:
World War II (55 million) including holocaust and Chinese revolution
1946-49: Chinese civil war (1.2 million)
1946-49: Greek civil war (50,000)
1946-54: France-Vietnam war (600,000)
1947: Partition of India and Pakistan (1 million)
1947: Taiwan's uprising against the Kuomintang (30,000)
1948-1958: Colombian civil war (250,000)
1948-1973: Arab-Israeli wars (70,000)
1949-: Indian Muslims vs Hindus (20,000)
1949-50: Mainland China vs Tibet (1,200,000)
1950-53: Korean war (3 million)
1952-59: Kenya's Mau Mau insurrection (20,000)
1954-62: French-Algerian war (368,000)
1958-61: Mao's "Great Leap Forward" (38 million)
1960-90: South Africa vs Africa National Congress (?)
1960-96: Guatemala's civil war (200,000)
1961-98: Indonesia vs West Papua/Irian (100,000)
1961-2003: Kurds vs Iraq (180,000)
1962-75: Mozambique Frelimo vs Portugal (10,000)
1962-75: Angolan FNLA & MPLA vs Portugal (50,000)
1964-73: USA-Vietnam war (3 million)
1965: second India-Pakistan war over Kashmir
1965-66: Indonesian civil war (250,000)
1966-69: Mao's "Cultural Revolution" (11 million)
1966-2016: Colombia's civil war (200,000)
1967-70: Nigeria-Biafra civil war (800,000)
1968-80: Rhodesia's civil war (?)
1969-: Philippines vs the communist Bagong Hukbong Bayan/ New People's Army (40,000)
1969-79: Idi Amin, Uganda (300,000)
1969-02: IRA - Norther Ireland's civil war (3,000)
1969-79: Francisco Macias Nguema, Equatorial Guinea (50,000)
1971: Pakistan-Bangladesh civil war (500,000)
1972-2014: Philippines vs Muslim separatists (Moro Islamic Liberation Front, etc) (150,000)
1972: Burundi's civil war (300,000)
1972-79: Rhodesia/Zimbabwe's civil war (30,000)
1974-91: Ethiopian civil war (1,000,000)
1975-78: Menghitsu, Ethiopia (1.5 million)
1975-79: Khmer Rouge, Cambodia (1.7 million)
1975-89: Boat people, Vietnam (250,000)
1975-87: civil war in Lebanon (130,000)
1975-87: Laos' civil war (184,000)
1975-2002: Angolan civil war (500,000)
1976-83: Argentina's military regime (20,000)
1976-93: Mozambique's civil war (900,000)
1976-98: Indonesia-East Timor civil war (600,000)
1976-2005: Indonesia-Aceh (GAM) civil war (12,000)
1977-92: El Salvador's civil war (75,000)
1979: Vietnam-China war (30,000)
1979-88: the Soviet Union invades Afghanistan (1.3 million)
1980-88: Iraq-Iran war (435,000)
1980-92: Sendero Luminoso - Peru's civil war (69,000)
1984-: Kurds vs Turkey (35,000)
1981-90: Nicaragua vs Contras (60,000)
1982-90: Hissene Habre, Chad (40,000)
1983-: Sri Lanka's civil war (70,000)
1983-2002: Sudanese civil war (2 million)
1986-: Indian Kashmir's civil war (60,000)
1987-: Palestinian Intifada (4,500)
1988-2001: Afghanistan civil war (400,000)
1988-2004: Somalia's civil war (550,000)
1989-: Liberian civil war (220,000)
1989-: Uganda vs Lord's Resistance Army (30,000)
1991: Gulf War - large coalition against Iraq to liberate Kuwait (85,000)
1991-97: Congo's civil war (800,000)
1991-2000: Sierra Leone's civil war (200,000)
1991-2009: Russia-Chechnya civil war (200,000)
1991-94: Armenia-Azerbaijan war (35,000)
1992-96: Tajikstan's civil war war (50,000)
1992-96: Yugoslavian wars (260,000)
1992-99: Algerian civil war (150,000)
1993-97: Congo Brazzaville's civil war (100,000)
1993-2005: Burundi's civil war (200,000)
1994: Rwanda's civil war (900,000)
1995-: Pakistani Sunnis vs Shiites (1,300)
1995-: Maoist rebellion in Nepal (12,000)
1998-: Congo/Zaire's war - Rwanda and Uganda vs Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia (3.8 million)
1998-2000: Ethiopia-Eritrea war (75,000)
1999: Kosovo's liberation war - NATO vs Serbia (2,000)
2001-: Afghanistan's liberation war - USA & UK vs Taliban (40,000)
2001-: Nigeria vs Boko Haram (20,000)
2002-: Cote d'Ivoire's civil war (1,000)
2003-11: Second Iraq-USA war - USA, UK and Australia vs Saddam Hussein's regime and Shiite squads and Sunni extremists (160,000)
2003-09: Sudan vs JEM/Darfur (300,000)
2004-: Sudan vs SPLM & Eritrea (?)
2004-: Yemen vs Houthis (?)
2004-: Thailand vs Muslim separatists (3,700)
2007-: Pakistan vs PAkistani Taliban (38,000)
2011-: Iraq's civil war after the withdrawal of the USA (150,000)
2012-: Syria's civil war (320,000)
2013-: ISIS in Syria, Iraq, Libya (?)
2013-15: South Sudan vs rebels (10,000)
2014-16: Ukraine's civil war (9,500)


Arab-Israeli wars
  • I (1947-49): 6,373 Israeli and 15,000 Arabs die
  • II (1956): 231 Israeli and 3,000 Egyptians die
  • III (1967): 776 Israeli and 20,000 Arabs die
  • IV (1973): 2,688 Israeli and 18,000 Arabs die
  • Intifada I (1987-92): 170 Israelis and 1,000 Palestinians
  • Intifada II (2000-03): 700 Israelis and 2,000 Palestinians
  • Israel-Hamas war (2008): 1,300 Palestinians

Main sources:
  • Charny: Genocide - A Critical Bibliographic Review (1988)
  • Stephane Courtois: Black Book on Communism (1995)
  • Clodfelter: Warfare and Armed Conflicts (1992)
  • Elliot: Twentieth Century Book of the Dead (1972)
  • Bouthoul: A List of the 366 Major Armed Conflicts of the period 1740-1974, Peace Research (1978)
  • R.J. Rummel: Death by Government - Genocide and Mass Murder (1994)
  • Matt White's website
  • Several general textbooks of 20th century history
  • Sources vary, and it is difficult to find one reliable source for everything. Many of these numbers keep changing.
  • Caution: In the age of Wikipedia there is also the problem that numbers tend to escalate dramatically as people on each side keep claiming higher and higher casualties. If one had to believe Wikipedia, the Middle East would be depopulated by now (instead of having consistently experienced a population boom). 
  • http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/massacre.html
screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-1-20-02-pm

Thursday, October 27, 2016

AL Gore: Panic! Global Warming Creating ‘Vast Deserts’


Image result for al gore Panic!






In what may be a new record in climate change hyperbole, an article inEsquire magazine Tuesday declares that man-made global warming is creating “vast deserts” out of once verdant lands, even as we speak.

Starting from the typical “conservatives-hate-science” leitmotiv, writer Charles S. Pierce goes on to make a series of ridiculously unscientific claims based on historical ignorance and bad math.
Climate change, Pierce asserts, “is piling up an impressive record of destroying the lives of many species, including our own.” One wonders: if climate change is on record as having destroyed the life of the human species, why wasn’t anyone told? Which scientific journal documented the destruction of the human race?
To back up his claim, Pierce notes that in various parts of the world, such as Madagascar, people are experiencing droughts and severe hunger, while failing to mention that famines have been going on literally for all of human history, even without the benefits of global warming.
Pierce also cites a New York Times article about China’s expanding deserts, which in turn cites “one recent estimate” that China’s deserts have grown by 21,000 square miles in the last 40 years (since 1975), and that the expansion may have been “accelerated” by climate change.
If this estimate is anywhere near correct, it suggests that the rate of expansion of China’s deserts has actually slowed dramatically since 1975. The New York Times admits that for many years, China’s deserts “spread at an annual rate of more than 1,300 square miles.” If they had been increasing at 1,300 square miles a year since 1975, desert land would have grown by 53,300 square miles—more than double the quoted estimate.
Moreover, later in the article, one reads that “generations of families have made a living herding animals on the edge of the desert” and that “overgrazing is contributing to the desert’s growth.”
So, if one takes the New York Times at its word, China’s deserts are growing far more slowly than in earlier decades, and much of that growth is due to “overgrazing.”
By any measure, that has nothing to do with global warming creating “vast deserts.”
Unwilling to let the facts get in his way, Pierce goes on to predict that the American west will also be facing desertification—just like what happened in the 1930s, he says. Once again he fails to note that the massive droughts that produced the dust bowl had nothing whatsoever to do with global warming.
“The next time it happens, it will happen in an era of profound ecological damage that by then may be irreversible,” Pierce ominously prophesies.

For a magazine devoted to combating the idea of “the Great Climate Change Hoax,”Esquire might want to look for a more convincing spokesperson next time. Or try fact-checking.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/26/esquire-panic-global-warming-creating-vast-deserts/